Genetic Variation: Prerequisite for Darwinian Change#
GENETIC VARIATION: PREREQUISITE FOR DARWINIAN CHANGE
- Introduction
- During the 20th century biologists have learned a great deal about how organisms change over time
- Microevolutionary mechanisms are well established and understood
- Macroevolutionary mechanisms remain more elusive
- Here we will begin to examine biological models of change
- In this lecture we will focus specifically on natural variation, a prerequisite for Darwinian change
- Darwin and natural selection
- Darwin was put off by the non-mechanistic models for change proposed by his contemporaries and predecessors
- He searched for a totally naturalistic model of change
- He called the process whereby change occurred natural selection
- He developed his model of natural selection on the basis of:
- Observations of organisms during his around-the-world voyage, particularly of those living on the Galapagos islands
- A deep appreciation for the principle of design as a result of his reading of Rev. William Paleys Natural Theology
- Acceptance of geological uniformitarianism as a result of reading Charles Lyells Principles of Geology
- An understanding of some basic population principles presented by the Rev. Thomas Malthus in An Essay on Population
- Personal experience in the breeding of a variety of organisms, particularly domestic pigeons
- The model was developed over a period of many years, and was finally published in his book On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (1859).
- This book argues two major points:
- That organisms change through time
- That this change occurs through natural selection
- The four postulates of natural selection theory:
- Individual members within a species exhibit variability
- Some of this variability is heritable
- More offspring are produced than can survive
- Organisms with features best suited to the environment pass on more genes than organisms less well suiteddifferential reproductive success or natural selection
- Thus, through time as environments change, so do organisms
- Genetic variation in natural populationsthe prerequisite for natural selection
- At one time variation was considered to be a deviation from the normal
- Perfect heavenly patternan ideal
- Real organisms were imperfect reflections of this ideal.
- This view grew out of Platonic dualism
- Today we know that variation IS the normit is present in all populations all of the time
- While not all of this variation is based in the genes, much of it is heritable
- In fact, Darwin would have been shocked to learn how much genetic variation there really is in natural populations
- Genetic variation can be evaluated at several levels:
- Variation perceived at the level of gross morphology
- Rat snakes (Elaphe obsoleta)
- Live in eastern United States
- Consist of six subspecies that interbreed where ranges meet
- The six subspecies exhibit strikingly distinctive color patterns
- Drongos (Dicrurus paraiseus)
- Crested birds that live in southern Asia
- Crests vary markedly from region to region
- Drosophila bristle number
- Average number of bristles on the bottom of the 4th and 5th abdominal segments is 36.
- Artificial selection created two lines
- Low bristle line
- Average of 30 bristles
- Line eventually died out due to sterility
- Apparently something related to low reproductive potential was selected along with low bristle number
- High bristle line
- After 21 generations an average of 56 bristles was achieved
- The high bristle line eventually began to show signs of sterility, so the flies were allowed to breed without selection
- The average bristle number fell to 40
- Selection was once again initiated
- The average of 56 was once again achieved, but this time with no signs of sterility
- Apparently the genotype became reorganized into more favorable combinations of alleles
- Variation perceived at the level of proteins
- Differences in proteins imply differences in DNA
- Proteins can be extracted from organisms and separated by chromatography or electrophoresis (since they tend to be charged molecules)
- Comparisons can then be made among the patterns of separated proteins
- Protein variation in wild populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura (Hubby and Lewontin, 1966)
- Show table
- Proportion of polymorphic gene loci (of the 18 tested) within the populations ranged from 0.28 to 0.33.
- Proportion of genes heterozygous within individuals ranged from 0.081 to 14.8.
- Human hemoglobin variationVernon Ingrams (1957) protein fingerprinting study
- Protein variation has been studied in a variety of organisms
- Show table
- Invertebrates generally exhibit higher levels of protein variation than vertebrates, both at the population and at the individual level
- Variation in the DNAthe most fundamental form of genetic variation
- A variety of techniques allow for comparison of DNA within and between species:
- RAPD analysis
- RFLP analysis
- Sequence analysis
- All these techniques show high levels of genetic variation at the level of DNA
- Preservation and promotion of genetic variability in nature
- Evolutionary biologists have not only shown that natural populations exhibit tremendous genetic variation, but also that mechanisms exist that function to preserve and promote this variation.
- Mechanisms for preserving and promoting genetic variability
- Mutations
- Mutations can be categorized as
- Gene
- Chromosomal
- Both types can result in morphological variability that can be acted upon by natural selection
- Mutations are occurring all the time in all organisms
- Often mutations are harmful or simply harmless
- But occasionally they can result in something helpful (e.g., a protein that can withstand a higher temperature)
- Mutations are the ultimate source of genetic variability among organisms because mutations produce brand new genetic material
- Sexual reproduction
- Produces variability through recombination events
- Independent assortment during meiosis
- Crossing over during meiosis
- Promotion of outbreeding
- In plants
- Anatomical barriers to self-fertilization
- Dioeciousness
- Self sterility
- In animals
- Anatomical features to prevent self-fertilization
- Movement away from birthplace to mate
- Incest taboos among humans
- Production of variability may be the most important function of sexual reproduction, an otherwise costly enterprise
- Diploidy
- Rare recessive alleles are hid from selection in the heterozygous state
- Here they can remain until a favorable environment develops
- Balanced polymorphismsnails eaten by thrushes
- Exist in two color morphs
- BandedFound in bogs and woodlands
- UnbandedFound in habitats with uniform backgrounds
- Predation pressure in heterogeneous environment thus maintains genetic variability
- Heterozygote superiority
- Heterozygotes are often better fit than homozygotes
- Obviously, this would promote variability.
- Example: Allele for sickle cell anemia
- HbNHbN genotype
- Subject to malaria
- Less fertile
- HbSHbS genotype
- Extreme anemia
- Die before reproduction is possible
- HbNHbS genotype
- Resistent to malaria
- Only mild anemia
- fertile, thus highest fitness
- Clines
- A cline is heritable variation within a species that follows some ecological gradient
- Example: House sparrow body size
- Smaller in south
- Larger in north
- This variation in body size is genetically based.
- Summary
- Far from being an aberration, genetic variability is the rule, not the exception
- Natural populations exhibit extensive variability, much more than Darwin could have imagined
- In fact, nature actively preserves and promotes genetic variability
- It is this genetic variability that serves as the raw material for natural selection